Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Gruul Leyline | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Gruul Leyline | suczi | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Gruul Leyline | czechito | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Gruul Leyline | ocaroca | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Gruul Leyline | sebastianpozzo | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Boros Aggro , Boros Auras , Goblins , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Counters , Gruul Leyline , Izzet Spellslingers , Mono Red Goblins , Naya Auras , Rakdos Aggro
Cacophony Scamp ranks #47 out of approximately 412 cards in raw efficiency (top 11%).
Red average: 68.2%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Cacophony Scamp is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Performance Efficiency: 37.13 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.0%. Cacophony Scamp has a win rate of 74.3%, making it 1.7% better than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leyline of the Void | Enchantment | 67 | 69.9% | 13 |
Desperate Measures | Instant | 14 | 68.7% | 5 |
Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 98 | 66.2% | 26 |
Volley Veteran | Creature — Goblin Warrior | 8 | 65.6% | 3 |
Duress | Sorcery | 49 | 65.5% | 11 |
Dragon Fodder | Sorcery | 9 | 64.7% | 3 |
Count on Luck | Enchantment | 36 | 64.5% | 6 |
Furnace Reins | Sorcery | 13 | 64.5% | 4 |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 20 | 62.8% | 2 |
Might of the Meek | Instant | 232 | 57.1% | 59 |
Cards that perform better with Cacophony Scamp than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Burst Lightning | Instant | 1 | 6 | 84.6% | 74.0% | +10.6% |
Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 4 | 15 | 78.9% | 73.8% | +5.1% |
Snakeskin Veil | Instant | 1 | 9 | 79.0% | 74.0% | +5.0% |
Emberheart Challenger | Creature — Mouse Warrior | 2 | 21 | 75.4% | 72.8% | +2.7% |
Heartfire Hero | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 1 | 25 | 74.3% | 72.7% | +1.5% |
Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 12 | 76.9% | 75.5% | +1.5% |
Manifold Mouse | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 2 | 19 | 73.1% | 72.7% | +0.4% |
Monstrous Rage | Instant | 1 | 25 | 74.3% | 73.9% | +0.4% |
Might of the Meek | Instant | 1 | 19 | 75.5% | 75.3% | +0.2% |
Leyline of Resonance | Enchantment | 4 | 25 | 74.3% | 74.3% | -0.0% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Gruul Leyline | 191 | 100.0% | 57.2% |
Gruul Aggro | 129 | 6.2% | 44.1% |
Rakdos Aggro | 36 | 61.0% | 47.6% |
Mono Red Goblins | 15 | 71.4% | 58.7% |
Goblins | 9 | 27.3% | 26.4% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.